Photo Source: (Whitaker, Guest, and Ennals 1982)
During
my undergraduate studies, I had the chance to visit Geneva Camp in Dhaka,
Bangladesh—a densely populated settlement that is home to the Bihari community.
Experiencing life inside this camp firsthand opened my eyes to the concept of
spatial justice and the reality of how space can be wielded as a tool of
exclusion. Biharis, who have lived in Bangladesh for generations, endure
systemic marginalization that restricts their access to basic rights,
resources, and recognition. My visit to Geneva Camp can reveal how spatial
injustice profoundly impacts the Bihari community’s identity, livelihood, and aspirations,
presenting an ongoing struggle for equity and belonging.
Spatial
justice, defined by the Design Studio for Social Intervention, is the
“intersection of space and social justice.” This concept emphasizes how
inequalities are not just economic or social but also embedded in physical
environments, denying certain groups access to thriving, secure spaces (Bailey, Lobenstine, and Nagel 2012). For the Bihari
community, the spatial limitations within Geneva Camp vividly reflect these
inequalities. Overcrowded, under-resourced, and located within an urban area
yet isolated, Geneva Camp exemplifies how marginalized communities are
restricted to spaces that curtail their mobility, rights, and social participation.
Photo: Bihari Camp in Bangladesh (Source:
www.tbsnews.net)
The
Bihari community’s story traces back to the 1947 Partition of India, when many
Biharis migrated to East Pakistan (now Bangladesh) to escape communal violence.
However, after Bangladesh’s independence in 1971, Biharis, often associated
with pro-Pakistani sentiments, faced backlash and were labeled “stranded
Pakistanis,” a designation that would shape their future in Bangladesh (Haider 2018). Although a 2008
court ruling granted Bangladeshi citizenship to Biharis born after 1971, many
continue to struggle with legal limbo, unable to access crucial documents such
as passports, which further restricts their mobility and participation in
society (Haider 2018).
Photo: Bihari Community (Source: www.thedailystar.net)
Geneva
Camp, one of the largest Bihari settlements, represents how spatial injustice
confines communities, reinforcing social divisions. While walking through this
place, I was struck by the camp’s lack of infrastructure—narrow passageways,
poor sanitation, limited access to clean water, and overcrowded housing units
that intensified feelings of isolation. According to Bhattacharjee (2018), Biharis endure
exclusion across five critical dimensions: social, economic, political,
cultural, and spatial. For many families in Geneva Camp, poverty is a daily
reality, with limited access to education, healthcare, and employment. Language
barriers and lack of formal job opportunities further restrict their economic
mobility, exacerbating their marginalization and alienation. Even though such
systemic barriers shape the Bihari community’s identity, they hinder generational
progress and maintain social exclusion (Bhattacharjee 2018).
Photo: A Bihari women protesting for their legal
rights
(Source: www.anindianmuslim.com)
Spatial
injustice within Geneva Camp is compounded by social stigmatization. Biharis
are often perceived as perpetual “outsiders” due to their historical ties to
Pakistan, a label that follows them even outside camp boundaries (Haider 2018). This
stigmatization affects every facet of their lives. Biharis are largely excluded
from formal job markets, and even those with valuable skills find themselves
relegated to low-paying, insecure positions. For example, despite the
contributions Biharis make to the economy through skilled trades, systemic
discrimination curtails their access to essential rights and opportunities,
effectively confining them to spaces like Geneva Camp and reducing their
ability to participate fully in society (Haider 2018). Despite their
technical right to vote, their lack of political representation means their
voices remain unheard, with limited agency in democratic processes (Whitaker, Guest, and Ennals 1982). They explain
that, though some Biharis have aspirations for integration, they face
significant obstacles due to regional politics, local hostility, and an absence
of supportive policies.
Visiting
the camp helped me to get a firsthand experience of underscoring how
marginalized groups are denied “spatial claims”—the rights to live, connect,
and thrive freely within society, as outlined in the Spatial Justice framework (Bailey, Lobenstine, and Nagel 2012). Biharis face
restrictions on both physical and social mobility, making Geneva Camp a stark
illustration of how space becomes a “terrain through which injustice is
experienced daily” (Bailey, Lobenstine, and Nagel 2012). Spatial justice
isn’t simply an academic concept—it’s a lens through which we can see how
marginalized communities are systemically confined to spaces that perpetuate
their social and economic hardships. The Biharis’ plight demands action and a
societal commitment to dismantling these barriers so that future generations
might see a Bangladesh that includes and values them as equals.
A
coincidence I want to express here is that there are many ethnic Bengalis,
descendants of migrants from Bangladesh (then East Pakistan) in the
1940s-1970s, who are stateless in Pakistan, especially in Karachi. Despite
living in Pakistan for generations, they face barriers to citizenship, which
impacts their access to employment, healthcare, and education. Statelessness
limits their ability to fully integrate and makes them vulnerable to
exploitation and poverty. I’m sharing the link to a report titled, “Stateless
and helpless: The plight of ethnic Bengalis in Pakistan” published by Aljazeera
for your reference.
References
Bailey, Kenneth, Lori Lobenstine, and Kiara Nagel.
2012. “Spatial Justice: A Frame for Reclaiming Our Rights to Be, Thrive,
Express and Connect.” Retrieved June 12:2022.
Bhattacharjee, Mowsume. 2018. “Dynamics of Social
Exclusion in Urban Bangladesh: A Sociological Study of Bihari Community.” Bangladesh
E-Journal of Sociology 15 (1).
https://www.academia.edu/download/78499557/Dynamics_20of_20Social_20Exclusion_20in_20Urban_20Bangladesh.pdf.
Haider, Zaglul. 2018. “Biharis in Bangladesh and Their
Restricted Access to Citizenship Rights.” South Asia Research 38
(3_suppl): 25S-42S. https://doi.org/10.1177/0262728018791695.
https://www.aljazeera.com/features/2021/9/29/stateless-ethnic-bengalis-pakistan
Whitaker, Ben, Iain Guest, and David Ennals. 1982. The
Biharis in Bangladesh. 11. Minority rights group. https://books.google.com/bookshl=en&lr=&id=zXYgEQAAQBAJ&oi=fnd&pg=PA6&dq=THE+BIHARIS+IN+BANGLADESH&ots=L5PiDkmLRv&sig=5ZXKOJUCfq56lghTKZOg6xwuzfw.
I appreciate how thoroughly researched your post is, Bodrul. I especially like the focus you pay to de facto and de jure methods of oppression, and how the spatial injustice faced by the Bihari community is enforced on economic, social, and legislative levels. Also, you raise a great point about the cumulative effects of spatial injustice over generations—seeing how the restriction of mobility leads to even greater restrictions on opportunity later is something that can be difficult when looking at the here and now, and you very importantly look at the issue in both the large-scale and small-scale both spatially and temporally.
ReplyDeleteSecondly, I think the last point you made about how the Partition of India in 1947 affected communities not only in Bangladesh but also in Pakistan shows a larger overarching trend of borders being used as a tool of oppression, particularly in the wake of European colonialism. This is seen especially in Africa today, where modern borders are the result of colonial partitions that often ignore the preexisting political landscape in favor of colonial interests. The geopolitical tensions that arise from cases like these can range from the oppression of displaced groups like the Biharis to the military tensions that exist in postcolonial states today.
Thank you for sharing this great blog! It’s so interesting to learn not only about the Biharis in Bangladesh but also their presence in Pakistan. One important aspect to reflect on is how spatial discrimination operates not just through state policies but also through societal attitudes and behaviors. This division reinforces exclusion that shapes their identity while perpetuating cycles of marginalization.
ReplyDeleteThis discussion of the Bihari community's struggles connects well with ideas from Anderson (1987) and Pulido (2000). Anderson talks about how places, like Chinatown, are deliberately shaped to reinforce racial categories and keep certain groups in marginalized positions. Pulido (2000) talks about how systemic privilege decides who gets access to good living conditions and who doesn’t. In the case of Geneva Camp, the overcrowded and neglected environment show how the Biharis are pushed into spaces that limit their opportunities and rights. Both authors show that spaces are not neutral but they reflect the power and inequalities in society. Regarding the interesting parallels between the Biharis in Bangladesh and Bengalis in Pakistan, how do you think these two communities' experiences compare in terms of the challenges they face, considering their different spatial contexts?
Thank you for your comment and for connecting the class materials. Comparing Biharis in Bangladesh and Bengalis in Pakistan reveals shared challenges like statelessness, restricted rights, and social exclusion. However, their spatial contexts introduce unique dynamics. In Bangladesh, Geneva Camp operates as a visible marker of exclusion, physically segregating the Bihari community and reinforcing their status as "outsiders." In Pakistan, the Bengalis face a more dispersed form of exclusion. While they may not live in camps as visible as Geneva Camp, their statelessness creates an invisible boundary from the other Pakistani people and access to rights in ways that are less spatially confined.
DeleteHi Bodrul! This is a very well researched and interesting post. I especially appreciated how you cited articles we did not read in this class to help explain the aspects of spatial justice. The images you included helped me better understand the Bihari community's reality, which was very needed as I have never heard of this community before. I also appreciated the paragraph you wrote at the end giving context to what the situation is in Pakistan.
ReplyDeleteOverall, I am left with one question--Why is the camp you visited called Geneva Camp? Is this the only name for this camp, or is there another in Bengali or other languages?
Hi Sophia,
DeleteAs far as I know, the International Committee of the Red Cross named the camp according to their law, The Geneva Conventions and Their Commentaries. Locally, we called it Bihari Camp.
"The 1949 Geneva Conventions and their Additional Protocols are international treaties that contain the most important rules limiting the barbarity of war. They protect people who do not take part in the fighting (civilians, medics, aid workers) and those who can no longer fight (wounded, sick, and shipwrecked troops, prisoners of war." ----(ICRC)
You can visit this website and watch the video for reference.
https://www.icrc.org/en/law-and-policy/geneva-conventions-and-their-commentaries
Bodrul, I really appreciate that you have shared insights on the challenges faced by the Bihari community and the idea of spatial justice connected to this. Your detailed analysis of Geneva Camp shows the ways in which systematic marginalization affects identity and opportunity through spatial exclusion. The connection between Bengalis in Pakistan and Biharis in Bangladesh is especially interesting since it highlights variations in spatial dynamics while highlighting the common struggles of statelessness. I had also opportunity to visit geneva camp and I specially loved their food.
ReplyDelete