Longing and Belonging: The Mountains I Can’t Climb

    Mountains have always been part of my life. Growing up surrounded by mountains so close I could reach out and almost touch them, yet so far I could never truly experience their beauty and freedom. That’s what it’s like to be from Quetta, Balochistan Pakistan. For me, the mountains weren’t just part of the landscape, they felt like part of me. They represented something wild and beautiful, a space I longed to explore. Yet, as a woman in a conservative and fragile society, the mountains in Balochistan were never truly accessible to me. Now, living in the United States, I find myself often comparing these two worlds. Here, public spaces and mountains are open, inviting, and a place for everyone. I’ve hiked through mountains here, feeling a freedom I never quite knew back home. It’s a feeling that’s both liberating and bittersweet, that has only deepened my yearning for Quetta’s mountains.

The Mountains of Home: Close but Unreachable  

    Quetta is a tribal society, where identity, honor, and community are bound by traditions that emphasize the control of spaces and social roles, particularly for women. These norms create strict boundaries between what is considered “appropriate” behavior and spaces for men and women. Women are often expected to remain within defined areas or to navigate public spaces with caution, especially in ways that reinforce modesty and community expectations. This restrictive view of “appropriate” spaces for women is a social boundary reinforced not only by family but by the entire community. While men freely enjoy the natural landscapes or take part in public life, women are expected to adhere to norms that keep them closer to home. These rules reflect what Mitchell (1995) would call “representations of space,” where public areas are socially controlled, with guidelines about who can access them and in what manner. In this way, the “public” is not truly public, as it excludes women and other groups in subtle but profound ways.    

    In Quetta, the mountains are all around us, especially in Mariabad, the neighborhood where my family resides. These rocky cliffs seem so close, yet there are invisible barriers that keep many of us, especially women, from venturing out. My connection to those mountains has always been more of a longing than a reality. For women, it is an unfulfilled right to the land that represent both an aspiration and a denial. Whitson (2017) describes how the right to access and belong in public spaces is often unequally distributed, and I feel this in my own experience. The mountains back home are another public space we’re not free to access. This limited access reflects the broader structure, where cultural values prioritize protection but end up restricting personal freedom and creating a social landscape where freedom and opportunity are unevenly shared. Mitchell’s reflections on public space and Whitson (2017) on the gendered right to belong have helped me articulate the struggle and yearning I carry for those mountains. They are part of me, even if I am, for now, not in their shadow. 

Experiencing Freedom in the Mountains of the U.S.

    Moving to the U.S. brought an unexpected joy and the freedom to explore nature. I’ve hiked in Zion, Bryce, Yellowstone, Grand Tetons, Arches and other parks. I remember my first hike in Zion, feeling the earth under my boots and the wide open sky above me. I also remember the thrill of standing atop a peak on Rendezvous in Grand Teton NP, looking down on the world without barriers. There, the mountains feel democratic as they are for everyone, no questions asked. It is a different world, one where the mountains felt inviting, not forbidding. But back home, such experiences are unimaginable. Here, there’s no fear of who might question my right to be there, no unspoken boundaries keeping me out. In Quetta, I’d be challenging norms by trying to hike but in the U.S., I’m just another person enjoying the view.




    In conclusion, public space, as both Mitchell (1995) and Whitson (2017) suggest, is more than a physical location. It is a concept shaped by power, social dynamics, and exclusion. Unlike my hikes in the U.S., where I felt the thrill of adventure and autonomy, a walk in the mountains back home would feel more like an act of defiance than of pleasure. In sharing this reflection with my classmates, I hope to convey more than just nostalgia for my homeland. I wish to invoke a vision of my hometown with its complex reality for women like me. One day, perhaps, those towering peaks will no longer be boundaries for women but pathways to freedom and a fuller identity. Also, I think Quetta’s mountains deserve to be explored, celebrated, and enjoyed by everyone in the community.  In the end, what I long for isn’t just the mountains themselves but the freedom they represent. I hope that one day, Balochistan’s mountains will be more than a backdrop for women.













Comments

  1. In the US many people and groups are trying to make the outdoors more welcoming. Early efforts mostly involved existing organizations like the National Outdoor Leadership School (NOLS) and Outward Bound offering scholarships to women and people of color but more recently organizations created by people of color with the mission of diversifying the outdoors have taken the lead. Some good examples are Outdoor Afro, and the National Brotherhood of Skiers.

    How do you think a women's hiking organization would be received in Pakistan?

    ReplyDelete
  2. Hello Rida! This was a very interesting blog post as I had no clue how beautiful the landscapes of Pakistan cities/towns were. It saddened me to know that you had these mountains this close to you your entire life, yet were not able to explore them. I would love to know of any efforts that are taking place to change the narrative of where women can/cannot be within public spaces or landscapes. I am glad that you have had the opportunity to see the wonderful parks that the United States has to offer!

    ReplyDelete
  3. Hi Rida! This was a fascinating post. I am sorry you have been excluded from exploring such a beautiful landscape. As I was reading your post, it occurred to me that we focus little on the inclusivity of nature. We spend so much time debating the physical and social accessibility/inclusivity of the built environment. We build ramps, widen doorways, and create safe spaces for all. While these things are greatly important, we may be neglecting such a massive part of our everyday lives, the natural environment. I want to thank you for sharing your story, and hopefully, we can work on making the beauty of nature a friendly space for all who seek to explore it.

    ReplyDelete
  4. Hi Rida! I love this blog post! I really appreciate your ability to tell a very personal narrative while also relating directly to our class themes. Public Space and who has access to said public space is really at the heart of all our discussions. In particular, it reminds me both of our discussions of the People's park in Berkeley and of the first blog post of this semester written by John.
    For the People's Park, the most striking comparison is on who owns space and who belongs in said space. As you described, because of your position in society, you were excluded from a right to belong in a space, much like how UC Berkeley has tried to exclude the community from belonging in the People's Park. It is part of a broader power imbalance which prioritizes those with either social or economic capital above all else.
    In relation to John's blog post, I think his points regarding "wild space" are highly relevant. These mountains, very likely, are far from untouched. They have been shaped by human development and civilization since the beginning. To disallow women specifically from accessing these "wild spaces" is not about preservation but rather a use of political power to enforce existing rules.
    Thank you so much for sharing this blog!
    - Sean M.

    ReplyDelete
  5. Hi Rida,
    I loved reading your article. Your blog post beautifully captures the complex relationship between identity, space, and freedom. As someone who enjoys trekking in Nepal and Bangladesh, I could relate to your connection with mountains. The way you describe Quetta’s mountains as both close and inaccessible is incredibly moving. It reminds me that public spaces can mean so much more than just physical locations.
    Your perspective on Quetta’s mountains as symbols of both aspiration and restriction is incredibly touching. It reflects the gendered dynamics in many parts of South Asia, where societal expectations often determine who can occupy public spaces and how they can do so. As you mentioned, the mountains in Quetta are not just landscapes. They are contested spaces where women’s presence is both questioned and constrained.
    Your experiences in the United States hiking in Zion, Bryce, Yellowstone, and the Grand Tetons were inspiring. It’s incredible how those same mountains, which represent freedom and adventure are here. I would also love to hike those areas. Thank you for sharing such a beautiful story.

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment