PBS |
As we deconstructed “home,” I was
reminded of Maid in America, a documentary that follows three domestic
workers in Los Angeles. Prado’s (2005) film showcases how family, prosperity,
and diligence varies from Telma, Judith, and Eva. Despite different
nationalities, these women appear similar “Under Western Eyes.” Mohanty explains
they are perceived as third-world women, oppressed and restricted to following
identifiers: ignorant, uneducated, domestic, poor, and family-oriented (1995,
p. 261). All are English-language learners confined to the domestic sphere,
working as nannies, maids, or housekeepers. Eva, Judith, and Telma may be
perceived as oblivious or unqualified because they lack proficiency in this
second language. Their jobs, in turn, focus on manual labor and reside in the
private sector, in which individuals determine employment eligibility. While
they diligently scrub toilets, fold laundry, and oversee other household
affairs, these individuals are not proportionally compensated for their efforts,
earning as little as five dollars per hour without health benefits (Prado).
Judith, Eva, and Telma do not have many employment avenues to explore without a
social security card or worker’s permit.
Without autonomy and security, a third world woman
transforms into an exile. They are “cut off from their roots, their land, their
past” (Said, 1984, p. 51). Judith, Telma, and Eva uprooted their life,
prospecting for opportunities to improve their condition. Unable to fully
transplant to the United State or exemplify Western expectations, las
domésticas acquire a “discontinuous state of being,” not quite belonging to a
particular geographical region nor resembling their prior selves (p. 51). These
exiles then develop “contrapuntal consciousness,” or an awareness of two
cultures, settings, homes (p. 55); even though Los Angeles is the setting of Maid in America, Eva, Judith, and Telma
have varying home countries: Mexico, Guatemala, and El Salvador, respectively.
They are aware of expectations as a worker, but also their role as caregivers
or housekeepers, undocumented immigrants, and mother or family member. Juggling
these scripts, consequently, grows too onerous that an exile’s achievements
“are permanently undermined by his or her sense of loss” (p. 49). Even though
wages and circumstances might seem better in the United States, Eva misses her
grandmother’s death and fails to mourn this tragedy with loved ones, whereas
Judith departs from four children which causes the youngest to give the title ‘mom’
to her biological aunt. Becoming a tax accountant or business owner are
undercut by key, transient moments with family, which is an integral component
of the third world woman stereotype.
I couldn’t help but think of
bell hooks. Maid in America complicates “mother worship” as Telma,
a Latina woman, works for an African American family. She particularly cares for
Mickey Marbury, their six-year-old son, to such an extent that he calls Telma “mom.”
Not only does Karol Marbury, Mickey’s mother, bring this up but she then analyzes
her own maternal role; she considers her work important yet her son even more
so, rationalizing why she sought a nanny. While there should be further analysis
on “mother worship” in this documentary, Maid in America supports
the notion of home as political. Prado’s (2005) juxtaposition of the domestic
worker’s homes with those of their employers exemplifies a disconnect, geographically,
materially, and symbolically. Eva, Telma, and Judith’s work in homes and may
have shelter yet lack place. They embody hook’s deduction: “For when a people
no longer have the space to construct homeplace, we cannot build a meaningful community
of resistance” (p.47). Their exploitation continued because of social and legislative
obstacles.
References
hooks, b. (1990). “Homeplace: a site of resistance.” in Yearning:
Race, Gender, and Cultural Politics, pp. 41-49. Boston: South End Press.
Mohanty, C. T.
(1995). Under Western Eyes: Feminist Scholarship and Colonial Discourses. In B.
Ashcroft, G. Griffiths, & H. Tiffin (Eds.), The Post-Colonial Studies
Reader, pp. 259-263. London: Routledge.
Prado, A. (Director).
(2005). Maid in America [Motion Picture]. Impacto Films.
Said, E. W. (1984, September). The Mind of Winter. Harper's, pp.
49-55.
HI, Amie! Reading your post I couldn't help but ask myself what would these women's current 'homes' are made of; what kind of 'home' they have to settle with. A precarious place with probably a permanent sadness and disempowerment feeling? Because I understand that when we talk about 'home' we are referring mainly to the ideal of home we all or each have, and I am wondering how does one negotiate a 'home' back home where all the family relations make up most of that home, but also is a home that neglects them a better economic opportunity for their families. On the other hand, when they migrate and get a job that provides them some of that financial means they lacked back at home, but at the same time all of the intimate daily connections with their homemaking relatives and friends are distanced...what is left for a 'home' to them? The fact that they cannot seek legal support, or even organize themselves to fight for their rights because of fear of there legal status further complicate things, because it deprives them from creating a resistance-home. The Mohanty reading that you mention is also very useful to try to understand how these women identities are probably affected by the new surroundings they inhabit: they are looked down as ignorant because they are doing such jobs, they are labeled ignorant and not educated, stereotyping the so called Third World Woman.
ReplyDeleteBut also because of the language barrier that created prejudice of being less smart or less capable intellectually. So, going back to my original question, what kind of home do you think they are left to work with? Assuming we always look to make a home wherever we are, and that home can also be a person, and can also be contained in sounds such as a song or a whistle, in melieus, like J. Macgregor says in its reading about "Home: Territory and Identity". Will theirs be more milieus that connect with other past milieus (memories) and result in territory (sort of like a home inhabited in the mind and feelings more than a physical one); or can we think of them rather as some sort of homeless?
*fear of their legal status
ReplyDeleteAmie your post on nannies, maids, and housekeeper are quite fascinating. You are right that these people relocated their life to search for a prospecting opportunities to improve their condition. Thus, does not make them a less human being. I was fortunate to grow up with house helpers, I always call one of them Yah mean mum because she almost the same age with my mum. They are maids who come from neighboring country Senegal in a region call Casamance. The major ethnicity who live in this region are destabilized with a long war and discriminated by other ethnic groups. Most of them don’t have the opportunity to formal education or formal works. The only prospect they have is to move to nearest cities and work as maids. My mum got two of them a cook and a housekeeper. They have different responsible in the house but they don’t have the negotiate power for their salaries. I can quite remember that my mum responsible for recruiting them, agreed on payment, who will be permanently staying in the house, and who will be not staying in the house overnight. However, the one who stay overnight always call our house home because she stay their permanently, the only time she has a chance to visit her family is during festive period. The other one start work at 8:00am and close at 6:00pm every day with the exception of Sunday. On Sunday they have their off day even the one that stay home don’t do anything in the house. Reading your post made me quiet remember these lovely women who served and love me for my entire childhood, the meaning and experience of home for them. The feeling of not quite belonging to a particular home or region is challenges.
ReplyDeleteI really like how you connected politics to the home. The home really is a political place, especially in a situation like Telma, Judith, and Eva are facing. Your post makes me think a lot about politics in the family too. Politics are always on my mind, especially at this time of year with the upcoming holidays. My dad’s family has differing viewpoints from myself, and every year I am nervous to see them. One of the main rules in most families, including my dad’s, is that we do not talk politics when we are all together. I used to be extremely grateful for this rule, as that meant that I did not have to be a one woman army and prepare myself for a berating from my grandmother. However, lately I have been starting to question this rule and the meanings behind it. I have realized that this rule comes from a place of privilege. Not everyone has the ability that we do to blissfully ignore politics, as it affects some people in ways that I will never be able to imagine or understand. This rule also says something very interesting about the dynamic of family and home together. Family is supposed to have this unbreakable bond, and be the place where we can feel the safest to talk about the things that mean the most to us. With this rule being in place, it says that I am not free or safe enough to speak my mind around those who matter most to me, and personally that has to change.
ReplyDeleteSo this Thanksgiving, I am going to be prepared to talk politics, no matter the wrath that I will face from my family. Thank you for the inspiration!
In Singapore, there are mainly two categorized maid is available - transfer maids and new maids. Transfer maid is highly in demand in Singapore as one gets an experienced maid who is just being transferred from one employer to another. If you are looking for an SG transfer maid then you can contact us. We are the best maid agency in Singapore and we work with the Ministry of Manpower from 1986. We can help you to hire a transfer maid by following legal procedure.
ReplyDelete