This week’s readings and subsequent discussions on geographic justice were not only enlightening but sparked a connection to my passion: education. My a-ha moment occurred when reviewing spatial power as outlined by Design Studio for Social Intervention; I couldn’t rid my brain of “the right to thrive and express” (p.4). Among other facets of life, thriving is especially important when developing the next generation of citizens. Schools play an integral role in such humanistic cultivation and can be viewed as a public value. However, there are varying monetary values on education. How can a student in one school district be worth $43,000 but less in another? The answer isn’t within the classroom, but beyond it: property taxes.
|
Association of American Editorial Cartoonist |
School funding depends on
local property taxes. Houses vary in value within and
between neighborhoods, causing districts to differ in amenities and resources.
While it’s easy to notice which sports’ team got new uniforms or choir
performed music from the new millennia, I considered my primary and secondary
education to be ‘normal.’ I conducted experiments in chemistry, attempted to
understand Shakespeare in English, pondered why all cafeteria food tasted
similar, and longed for the days where I didn’t have to ride the bus. It wasn’t
until college that I realized ‘school’ had alternative meanings. My new pals
had two- or three-story high schools, 1-to-1
technology, multiple Advanced Placement (AP) classes, and even an actual
cafeteria. My school served lunch in an entryway, had only two AP courses,
maybe had Windows 7 after Windows 10 released, and was one floor. I knew money usually
offered additional opportunities but didn’t think it influenced content. I
remember being so dumbfounded that my friends had AP classes for almost every
subject, leaving me to wonder if I was taught the same things as my peers.
Library of Congress |
Thus, such an educational,
yet inherently unconstitutional, procedure highlights wealth’s geographical
organization. Shabazz asserts, “Poverty and wealth are organized spatially.
Poor people and wealthy people do not live next to each other…we can map
poverty and inequality through zip codes across the nation” (2016). This is
further disheartening when zip codes are also used to predict American College
Testing (ACT) scores (Berliner & Glass, 2014). Social class then compounds
when coupled with race as discussed in “Why Geography Matters in the Struggle
for Racial Justice.” Urban schools, for example, become stereotypically
synonymous for students of color with low socioeconomic status.
I could talk about this for
ages and still have more to say because education, like other topics, is
contextual and influenced by other systems. If you want to dive deeper into the
rabbit hole, feel free to click on the hyperlinks throughout my post—they’re
quite eye-opening!
References
Berliner, D. C., & Glass, G. V. (2014). 50
Myths and Lies that Threaten America's Public Schools: the Real Crisis
in
Education. New York: Teachers College Press.
Design Studio for Social Intervention. Spatial Justice: A
Frame for Reclaiming our Rights to Be, Thrive, Express, and Connect.
Retrieved from http:ds4si.org/storage/SpacialJustice_ds4si.pdf
Joffe-Walt, C. (Producer). (2015, March 15) Three Miles [Audio podcast]. Retrieved from https://www.thisamericanlife.org/550/three-miles/.
Shabazz, Rashad. (2016). “Why Geography Maters in the
Struggle for Racial Justice.” Retrieved from https://www.mprnews.org/story/2016/02/09/mpr_news_presents.
Why America's Schools Have A Money Problem. (2016, April 16). Retrieved from
Thanks for this post, Amie! Here is a related article I just read yesterday... it ties the Ohio School Report Card Grades (the state's ratings of the schools) to district income levels. The relationship couldn't be more clear!
ReplyDeletehttps://expo.cleveland.com/news/g66l-2019/09/eafdac15366565/see-how-closely-ohio-school-report-card-grades-trend-with-district-income.html