As we discussed in class on
Thursday, memorialization is often an elite-directed process driven by those in
power with a vested interest in controlling the narrative of a memorialized
event. However, if memorials are “arenas” in which “social actors and groups…debate
and negotiate the right to decide what is commemorated and what version of the past
will be made visible to the public,” we should also expect to see memorials
that are not derived from a purely elite perspective (Dwyer & Alderman,
2008, p. 171). As mentioned in class, there are a multitude of sites that might
be considered as examples of memorials as arenas, but I’d like to highlight one
recent example from the United States. Some of you may be familiar with the Monument
Quit, a memorial space for survivors of rape and abuse that has traveled around
the country over the past few years. It made a stop at Peden Stadium in 2017
and was last displayed on the National Mall from May 31 – June 2, 2019.
In class, we also spoke in class
about memorials not typically being erected for “ongoing” or permissible violence,
violence that is necessary to maintain the status quo and therefore goes unacknowledged
or underrepresented in the dominant narrative. The Monument Quilt is one example
of what a memorial for this type of violence, here sexual violence, might look
like. The quilt project began as an initiative of a Baltimore non-profit, FORCE:
Upsetting Rape Culture. The choice of a quilt was no accident – the organizers
were influenced by the AIDS Memorial Quilt, first displayed on the National
Mall in 1987 (“AIDS Memorial Quilt”).
The medium of a quilt was intentional
as well. In some ways a quilt is a logical medium for incorporating a multitude
of voices into a single display; the patchwork design of a quilt lends itself
well to being added to over time by many people. However, quilting is also
historically associated with feminine crafts, and the Memorial Quilt in
particular can be situated both as a continuation of the dialogue started by
the AIDS Memorial Quilt and as a part of the reclamation of traditional
femininity associated with some third-wave feminist movements (Groeneveld, 2009).
By displaying both of these quilts on the National Mall, in the midst of
memorials sanctioned by the government, both of these groups of activists deliberately
put their memorials in conversation with those erected by the state. They
further used these moveable memorials as mechanisms through which to stake a
claim to public space and engage in public dialogue around types of violence
that are often ignored and permitted.
Photo credit: https://www.washingtonpost.com/express/2019/05/30/monument-quilt-displaying-thousands-stories-survivors-sexual-assault-will-make-its-way-dc/ |
Cleve Jones (2016), one of the organizers of the AIDs Memorial Quilt, gave a speech when the quilt was first displayed on the National Mall. He said,"Today we have borne in our arms and on our shoudlers a new monument to our nation's capital. It is not made of granite or steel and was not built by stonecutters and engineers. Our monument is sewn of fabric and thread, and was created in homes across America and wherever friends and families gathered to remember their loved ones lost to AIDS." The organizers of the Monument Quilt echoed Jones' sentiment about the quilt serving as a different kind of memorial space, one that amplifies experiences of violence that have been silenced and provides a public space for these stories to be heard (Haupt, 2019).
Not only has the Monument Quilt worked
to create public space for a dialogue around rape and sexual abuse, but it has
also publicly created space for survivors to heal. In creating the quilt, FORCE
gave any survivor who wished to participate the chance to send in a quilt square
of their making. In brining these multitude of voices together, the Monument Quilt
created a literal patchwork of the many faces that survivorhood can take. These
stories were written, painted, and stitched onto red fabric (the color chosen
by FORCE to give the quilt some cohesive appearance) and when displayed, the squares
were typically used to spell out a message of solidarity, most often “NOT ALONE.”
Though neither the Monument Quilt nor the AIDs Memorial Quilt were intended as
permanent memorials in the sense that they were never meant to occupy a single
space forever, these projects have been catalogued online and serve as living records
of waves of otherwise unacknowledged violence and the material consequences of
that violence for victims and survivors.
Sources:
“About: The AIDS Memorial Quilt.” n.d. Accessed September 30,
2019. https://www.aidsquilt.org/about/the-aids-memorial-quilt.
Dwyer, Owen J. and Derek H. Alderman. 2008. “Memorial
Landscapes: Analytic Questions and Metaphors.” GeoJournal 73: 165-178.
Groeneveld, Elizabeth. 2019.“’Be a Feminist or Just Dress
Like One:’ BUST, Fashion, and Feminism as a Lifestyle.” Journal of Gender
Studies 18, no. 2 (Summer): 179-190.
Haupt, Angela. May 30, 2019. "The Monument Quilt--displaying thousands of stories from survivors of sexual assault--will make its way to D.C." The Washington Post. https://www.washingtonpost.com/express/2019/05/30/monument-quilt-displaying-thousands-stories-survivors-sexual-assault-will-make-its-way-dc/
Jones, Cleve. October 9, 2016. "How One Man's Idea for the AIDS Quilt Made the Country Pay Attention." The Washington Post. https://www.washingtonpost.com/national/health-science/how-one-mans-idea-for-the-aids-quilt-made-the-country-pay-attention/2016/10/07/15917576-899c-11e6-b24f-a7f89eb68887_story.html.
Swell post, Katie!
ReplyDeleteVisiting the Monument Quilt was an experience. It was surreal to be simultaneously within and surrounded by the piece, which itself was composed of numerous artworks itself. Consequently, I agree that medium was purposeful, taking form as a quilt to stitch together stories with a common thread of sexual violence. Such a textile form not only makes an experience, feeling, and/or process tangible, but serves as a spatial claim; survivors exercised their right to be within each patch, while the entire quilt expressed their entitlement of security regardless of gender, sexual orientation, or other facet of self (Design Studio for Social Intervention, p. 4). The Monument Quilt literally represents spatial justice, seeing patterns among places by paying attention to the particular; individuals share their narrative and contribute to the overarching pattern of sexual abuse and rape in the United States.
Additionally, the particular use of fabric also reminded me of the “What Were You Wearing” Survivor Art Installation. Juxtaposing survivor interviews and outfits contributes to the notion of body as place, the site most intimate site of the particular. Even though they vary in shape, size, McDowell argues, “…the ways in which bodies are presented to and seen by others vary according to the spaces and places in which they find themselves” (1999, p.34). The Survivor Art Instillation, therefore, sought to debunk stereotypes associated with sexual assault, particularly that one’s outfit provoked it. Here, sweatshirts, running shorts, and pajamas embody the victim, but also the once violated boundary between two people. Check out this video regarding the installation: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Dj41zNSLAUQ.
--Amie
References
Design Studio for Social Intervention. Spacial Justice: a Frame for Reclaiming our Rights to Be, Thrive, Express, and Connect.
McDowell, L. (1999). “In and Out of Place: Bodies and Embodiment.” In Gender, Identity, and Place: Understanding Feminist Geographies. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.