Wall
as a place
Is
difficult to think of a wall as a place. For being a “place” it has first to be
a “space” and a wall is hardly a space, is usually considered a boundary, an
element that establishes limits. In the case of the one that divides the Occupied
Palestinian Territories from the State of Israel it is a place, a very
important place indeed. The recognition of it as a place is given at the moment
it receives a meaning. Depending in which side people are located, the wall can
mean protection or segregation. Is difficult to divide individuals affected by
the wall into the ones that live “inside” and the ones that live “outside” the
wall, or using their nationalities as distinction of the side they inhabit. The
wall has not divided people making a clean cut; it has separated families and
communities in its attempt to include all the Israeli settlements dispersed
throughout the territory and exclude the Palestinian ones. This mixed
population in both sides of the wall can represent the failure of the wall in
its attempt of protection, but it can also demonstrate the capacity of
individuals to occupy the same space even though they are not supposed to.
It
cannot be denied that other characteristic that gives the wall the category of
place is the power it has over people, not only regarding mobility but also in
marking and defining them; creating a “Wall Regime” (Alatout, 2009). Preventing
the mobility of an individual without reason is an act of violence, and from
that moment on, this individual is marked. It is also an act of segregation
based in arbitrary elements that result from different social constructs, and,
in which, one individual is defined as the one with power over the other. The
wall not only exercises its physical power over Arab Palestinians who are not
always allowed to enter the State of Israel, but it also has psychological and
emotional effects. Reminding people that they have no power over their own
mobility, which in some cases also includes access to more complete education
or health facilities. The constant presence and surveillance of the wall and
everything it implies can also change the idea Palestinians have of themselves.
Defining their identity in a social construct build by external agents can
represent a problem but it can also lead to resistance. In the wall itself
forms of resistance can be appreciated, in the form of art or graffiti. Is a
way of taking space to advocate for social justice, reinforcing that the wall
is a place. A place that segregates and divides, but also a place where
individuals can express themselves.
Article:
The
Wall in Bethlehem That Segregates and Subjugates Palestinians, by T.M. Krishna
(https://thewire.in/117028/the-wall-in-bethlehem-that-segregates-and-subjugates-palestinians/)
Music
Video filmed in Palestine: Multiviral by Calle 13 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EjSCy1GC6Sc
First I would like to say I enjoyed the reading we had for class about this subject and the article you added to your post. This wall is one that does not get much attention unless something 'drastic' occurs. The last time I can remember hearing about the wall this year was when Banksy opened a walled off hotel in Bethlehem (March). It was given a three-minute segment on the NBC Nightly News with Lester Holt. The article says the wall was built to keep out attackers but we all know it is a way for Israel to gain more land and it has become a place of oppression. While we do not hear about this wall as often as we should, we do hear about the Mexico United States border more frequently than any of us want to.
ReplyDeleteDonald Trump’s latest idea for the border wall is to build a see-through wall. He said “If you can't have vision through it, you don't know who's on the other side”. Building a see-through wall will not only show who is on the other side but it will show the people who are suffering because of the wall. You will see families that are separated from each other trying to communicate. It is a symbol of oppression and superiority. It is not a wall for protection as the president claims. This border wall is not the answer to the immigration ‘problem’ or the drug problem. It was a device used to garner votes and support for an anti-immigration agenda. It is a huge waste of money, since we all know Mexico will not be paying for the wall. This money could be spent on education, renewable energy, or the national parks. On top of being a waste of money, it has a large impact on the endangered and threatened wildlife of the area.
First article
http://www.aljazeera.com/news/2017/03/banksy-wall-hotel-bethlehem-170303223157930.html
Second article
https://www.dallasnews.com/news/politics/2017/09/23/trumps-new-border-wall-specs-see-skip-river-pick-design