Saturday, September 21, 2019

On Place and Memory: Berlin, Scars and Social Memory

The Cresswell (2004) reading on “Place and Memory” reminded me (memories brought to present) of a city that impacted me when I visited it exactly because of its way of making memories feel alive in such an effective way you cannot help but cry sometimes when you are visiting some of its spaces, memorials or monuments. I’m talking about Berlin in Germany. I visited it back in 2011 and went on the historical tour that took me throughout the city where they have practically all of it marked with historic points of interest from the Nazi period. 

One very interesting thing to highlight is how the place where Hitler committed suicide (his bunker) is purposefully not made a tourist attraction point, nevertheless is not erased from the city's history. Actually there is a housing development built in the 80s and only an informational board set up in the midst of the parking lot gives information in the form of facts and myths of Hitler’s defeat and suicide. At a public level, like Cresswell (p. 90) says, which memories get to be promoted and how is a political decision. And this is clearly a very smart and thoughtful one.

Hitler's bunker and suicide place is intentionally marked only with this 
information board in the middle of a parking lot of a contemporary housing 
project  built over the destroyed bunker. HNAPEL/WIKIMEDIA COMMONS
Hitler’s bunker and suicide place is an example. The way it’s marked within the city is clearly an intentional political decision of how they want history to remember the deranged leader of this dark episode of German and world history. They did not want to either make it a place for supremacists to peregrine, nor they wanted it to be a target for attacks. I think it was a brilliant way to solve it: a contemporary housing project built over the destroy bunker where regular citizens live and at the same time not erasing it from history by marking the place with a factual information board in a marginal place such as a parking lot.

Another place that came to my memory while reading Cresswell is the Holocaust Memorial in Berlin. A huge artistic display that features concrete vertical pieces set up sort of like a city or sometimes like a huge concrete orderly maze. 
Intriguing and controversial Holocaust Memorial space in Berlin designed by an American architect is a place that does not leave anyone indifferent. Getty Images.


The first thing that comes to mind when you are there is that they resemble graves. But there are all plain, no inscriptions or names or any marks; they are all of different sizes sometimes bigger than you, sometimes just a step up your feet. You can get lost in its corridors at some parts. And it is also interesting to notice how small kids climb them sometimes as it was a playground. At times it looks like a city’s buildings, at times as a graveyard. 

Like the architect has said, it was built to get any personal interpretation, although it has been criticized precisely for being too abstract. To me, it was a place where at the same time you could feel a tense calm and peace but disturbing too. This mixed emotions that such a huge and imposing place generates is a sign of the brilliancy of how this place was design and built for memories to interact with the monument. What you know about the Holocaust, what you learn about it while being in this country and experiencing the places, what you feel while your knowledge interacts with your feelings and memories that aren’t even yours but of a collective group that suffered so much.

Holocaust Memorial in Berlin. A controversial monument - place - that invites diverse interpretations and meanings. Photos from Getty Images.

Underground this memorial is an information center that is like a museum with also amazingly arranged rooms to bring history to the present, as Cresswell says. Each room is very different and two of them caught more my attention. One rather small room very dimly lit with people walking around a few tomb graves with light coming out of them. 

Each one has a name, date and story told through a real letter that was recovered, handwritten by someone going to the extermination camps that managed to throw the letters outside the cramped trains. Sometimes there are pictures of the person, sometimes not. But as you move from tomb to tomb reading the handwritten letters and placing a name or a face to it, the experience is overwhelming with emotions and you cant help sobbing, and hearing other people around sobbing as well. It is very moving.




But one of the most impactful rooms to me was one that uses sound more than vision and it is called the Room of Names, simple concept: name the fallen, make them exist for you. You go into a tall room with tall white walls and a few benches. You sit down or stand up and then a voice starts reading names and last names, birth and death dates while the four walls show at once the name that is being read out loud. This seemed so simple to me and yet so moving because the assassinated were named, each their single stories and lives were being honored and not forgotten every time we hear their names, we think of the personal private suffering, their identities relived and rescued for collective .

Room of Names is a space where sound is the main medium to link history and the present, the personal and the collective, the person listening the names of the dead produces feelings and ever lasting memories where history and present intertwines. Visitors Center, Berlin.

There are only two more places I want to share with you from this experience with places and memories I had in Berlin. One is the Concentration Camp I visited, and of course many, many things can be said about it (Cresswell takes a critique for the Catholic appropriation intent of one of these camps), but I will just share with you the sight among all that really broke me down from the many there are in such a memory-place. It was a pile of worn out shoes stiff because of passing time; every size shoes, by the crematory ruins. Just to think of each person that worn them and that lost their lives in such horrible conditions is beyond moving.

(PLACE YOUR MEMORY HERE)

Lastly, a place that does not have to do precisely with the Nazi regime but with the Cold War in Berlin is the Berlin Wall. And this reminds me also Alatout’s reading on the Israeli wall. So as to not make this post longer than it is, I will just point out to the fact that after the Berlin wall was torn down in 1989 several sections of it were preserved for memory and history telling. And of course is the first thing you want to see when you go to Berlin, the wall. The very interesting thing to me about how those sections have been preserved is that they have intervened them with art. A piece of the wall is painted by an artist showcasing whatever they want to in relation to the wall, their own memories, thoughts and feelings. A wall that for political-ideological reasons was built to separate bodies and to prevent their mobilization; a wall that was torn down materially by those bodies; a wall today preserved for history and memory through artistic interventions. Freedom and creativity wining over repression and suppression. A new place and experience is built over the old without erasing it so that its consequences are never forgotten, but a re-appropriation of meaning of such place.


(1961) Walls as technology of Ideology. The Berlin wall being reinforced by East German workers near the Brandenburg Gate. Research.archives.gov
(1986) Three years before it came down, graffiti only on the West side of the wall while the East side is 'clean' and guarded. The Guardian.

 
(1989) Wall torn down. Time.com.
(1989) Bodies tearing down the wall of confinement. Time.com

 
Tourists take pictures by preserved sections of the wall which have new
meanings through their appropriation by art. The Guardian 

Other sections:








More Berlin Wall Art: 

VIDEO from 1989 actual crumbling of the wall:  


Berlin Art in the city:










6 comments:

  1. This comment has been removed by the author.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Hello Claudia,

    Your post was extraordinary and very well arranged. I like how you were able to incorporate your real-life experiences and translate your emotions.

    Reading your thoughts on Hitler's bunker, I was reminded something that resonates with me. How to preserve the horrors of a country's history while not being offensive? Especially to the identity groups that had been the object of a nation’s horrific treatment. Although my county has inflicted much pain on various groups, when thinking about the evil history of the U.S., I immediately think of slavery.

    Slavery and the inherent racism accompanying is called "America's Original Sin" by Jim Wallis(1). Not many will argue that slavery has created more historical misery for the U.S. than any other of the country’s hegemonic deeds. (I believe that our original sin is the genocide committed against Native Americans). In his book, Wallis also uses “original sin” to describe deep rooted racism in the U.S. I think the statues memorializing Confederate leaders(2) are not only vestiges of slavery but serve as a reminder to black Americans, in particular southern black Americans, that they don’t belong and that they better beware of what will happen again if they don’t stay in their place. These 700 reminders of brutal consequences didn’t begin to appear until after several years since the start of Reconstruction.

    These enforcers of Jim Crow laws(3) made their debut all over the south in the 1890’s and continued to be erected up to the start of the Civil Rights Movement(4) in 1954. Displayed in visible central locations, “(a)ll of those monuments were there to teach values to people. (The values were) glorification of the cause of the Civil War.” (Mark Elliott, a history professor at University of North Carolina, Greensboro). I believe it’s clear that the statues weren’t strategically placed to preserve history, but as a tool of oppression. What does this have to do with your story about preserving the marker of Hitler’s bunker?

    I also think that Hitler’s bunker site should be remembered, but only in the way you described. The history of our country’s bloodiest war should be catalogued. We need to be forced to remember our grotesque history of slavery. I hate the idea of subjugating fellow citizens by reminding them of ancestral suffering and historical systemic racism. I want those things tore down.

    I assume you are aware that this is a very controversial subject. The ugly events(5) that caused the death of antifascist demonstrator Heather Heyer(6) began as a Unite the Right rally(7) to protest the proposed removal of a statue of General of The Confederate Army Robert E. Lee. Some people say the statues should remain because they are reminders of southern white heritage or that tearing them down would be forgetting our history. I say those opinions are thinly veiled racism and a plea to cling on to white supremacy. I have an idea to preserve our darkest history and alleviate our pain.

    I propose that we remove and store these monuments to white supremacy as New Orleans Mayor Mitch Landrieu(8) has done. As soon as every last one has been banished from the landscape, we dig a giant hole in an undesirable, uninhabited space in the south. And invite the ancestors of slaves to heave them in with heavy equipment. The hole should remain open for those interested in preserving history and/or southern white heritage. What do you think?

    Sincerely,

    Jeremy

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Claudia,

      I was unable to include my citations with my comment due to maximum word restraints. here are my citations:

      (1) "America's Original Sin" by Jim Wallis:
      https://sojo.net/sites/default/files/americas-original-sin-study-guide.pdf

      (2) The statues memorializing Confederate leaders:
      https://www.history.com/news/how-the-u-s-got-so-many-confederate-monuments

      (3) Jim Crow laws:
      https://www.history.com/topics/early-20th-century-us/jim-crow-laws

      (4) Civil Rights Movement:
      https://www.history.com/topics/black-history/civil-rights-movement

      (5) The ugly events:
      https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Charlottesville_car_attack

      (6) Heather Heyer:
      https://www.nytimes.com/2017/08/13/us/heather-heyer-charlottesville-victim.html

      (7) Unite the Right rally:
      https://www.splcenter.org/unite-the-right

      (8) New Orleans Mayor Mitch Landrieu(8):
      https://www.cbsnews.com/news/what-happened-to-two-removed-new-orleans-confederate-statues/


      Delete
    2. Hello Claudia,

      I agree with your argument that the housing development and informational board discourages the space, built atop the bunker in which Hitler would have commited suicide, from being a tourist attraction. I liked how you cited Cresswell in describing how in which memories of places are manipulated and promoted politically. Had the German government decided to restore the bunker it would have come as great insult to those who gave their lives to fight against Naziism. And similarly the same applies as Jeremy said earlier in regards to the preservation of Confederate Statues. Thousands of people gave their lives to end slavery and bring about stability to the United States. The notion that those who want to preserve these confederate relics are acting out of pride for their southern ways of life is an utter facade for the ugliness hidden underneath.
      My grandpa served in the 20th armored division in World War 2. He was a gunner in a tank during the liberation of Dachau concentration camp. Having seen the horrors of war he found it very difficult to talk about upon being reentered into society. Despite not really understanding the full depth of the weight he had carried when I was a kid. I knew that he had said before that he’d never go back to Germany.
      When Cresswell mentions the Catholicization of Auschwitz and the way in which the area had been manipulated politically by the Soviet backed communist regime in Poland so as to serve as a site of Western aggression. Its extremely disturbing and profound and if you scale out and look at the history of war in the United States you’ll see that the undermining of the role minorities held is extremely sad. Not only were there contributions often ignored, but they often would return to a society in which treated them with similar prejudice as the people they were ordered to kill. Thus just as Auschwitz was a target of political manipulation, so was society itself.
      Anti-Semitism surely didn’t stop after my Jewish grandpa returned from war. Furthermore, many institutions seemed to tacitly go along with it. Whereas anti-Semitic arguments blaming Jews for Jesus’ death were widespread across Western society for decades. When my dad grew up Country Clubs were spaces exclusive to Jews (3). This comes as no surprise since for much of its history golf has been a historically white anglo saxon protestant game. These spaces were spatial claims made on behalf of rich white men. The inability to dwell or stay in a given place is represented by Kenneth Bailey, Lori Lobenstine, and Kiara Nagel article (4). This racial makeup still dominates contemporary Western society today as shown in Peggy McIntosh's article on “White Privilege and Male Privilege.”
      There’s undeniable parallels between the Holocaust Memorial Space in Berlin and a graveyard. The lack of writing on the individual stones seems symbolic to the countless number of lives lost during the holocaust and the inhumanity in which the victims were treated with. While some argue that the memorial lacks a prominent message, I find the symbolism easy to read. Furthermore, if one was to find such a monument displeasing like one of the journalists did in the New Yorker (8). Than they could at least agree that as an art installation it at least has some merits. And as Claudia mentioned in her blog post below the memorial is an information center with tombs showing names, dates, and stories. So perhaps the argument against the memorial being too abstract can be alleviated when coupled with the museum below.

      Delete
    3. References

      1.
      https://history.army.mil/documents/ETO-OB/20AD-ETO.htm

      2.
      https://learn-us-east-1-prod-fleet01-xythos.s3.us-east-1.amazonaws.com/5c1270dbb5a74/1033132?response-content-disposition=inline%3B%20filename%2A%3DUTF-8%27%27cresswell%2520memory.pdf&response-content-type=application%2Fpdf&X-Amz-Algorithm=AWS4-HMAC-SHA256&X-Amz-Date=20190924T024304Z&X-Amz-SignedHeaders=host&X-Amz-Expires=21599&X-Amz-Credential=AKIAIBGJ7RCS23L3LEJQ%2F20190924%2Fus-east-1%2Fs3%2Faws4_request&X-Amz-Signature=529d8d839a6268758583fa7c622b478956cacf3465bdedb4f2f75f414334edfd

      3.
      https://www.latimes.com/archives/la-xpm-1990-08-12-vw-646-story.html

      4.
      https://learn-us-east-1-prod-fleet01-xythos.s3.us-east-1.amazonaws.com/5c1270dbb5a74/926505?response-content-disposition=inline%3B%20filename%2A%3DUTF-8%27%27SpatialJustice_ds4si.pdf&response-content-type=application%2Fpdf&X-Amz-Algorithm=AWS4-HMAC-SHA256&X-Amz-Date=20190924T033101Z&X-Amz-SignedHeaders=host&X-Amz-Expires=21600&X-Amz-Credential=AKIAIBGJ7RCS23L3LEJQ%2F20190924%2Fus-east-1%2Fs3%2Faws4_request&X-Amz-Signature=e5dc4fd289b0c5dc695e701595885ae71c265fc6873e9894672f067e1ab91568

      5.
      https://www.history.com/news/how-the-u-s-got-so-many-confederate-monuments


      6.
      https://www.history.com/topics/world-war-ii/dachau

      7.
      https://learn-us-east-1-prod-fleet01-xythos.s3.us-east-1.amazonaws.com/5c1270dbb5a74/49849?response-content-disposition=inline%3B%20filename%2A%3DUTF-8%27%279-9%2520-%2520McIntosh%2520-%2520white%2520privilege.pdf&response-content-type=application%2Fpdf&X-Amz-Algorithm=AWS4-HMAC-SHA256&X-Amz-Date=20190924T035734Z&X-Amz-SignedHeaders=host&X-Amz-Expires=21600&X-Amz-Credential=AKIAIBGJ7RCS23L3LEJQ%2F20190924%2Fus-east-1%2Fs3%2Faws4_request&X-Amz-Signature=e60f543bd07e31ed7bc7d698148be136a386ce1b520149a85f660524a6b144b3

      8.
      https://www.newyorker.com/culture/richard-brody/the-inadequacy-of-berlins-memorial-to-the-murdered-jews-of-europe

      Delete
  3. Hey Claudia,

    Great examples. They are so different and I did not know about the bunker and grave site.

    Yes the top tomb area of the holocaust museum is super abstract, but that combo with the room on the bottom floor seems to make up for that. So I see it as an aesthetically pleasing introduction and gathering-of-tourists technique.

    Now, that restoration of the Berlin Wall. I think it's an important memorial object, but I wonder if there are any other objects around that area that may be potential spaces of illustration, discussion and reflection.

    I'm not big on visiting Europe, because there are so many tourist spaces and places that merit attention and a fair share of revenues from tourism. But now I want to go to Berlin. Thanks!

    ReplyDelete